Rtch/Lephisto
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[Change] Using remove() as apposed to unlink() for portability.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Allanis 2014-02-02 19:54:37 +00:00
parent 45333c33d5
commit 099e1ba251
2 changed files with 2 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

1
TODO
View File

@ -5,7 +5,6 @@ Vital:
-- System obstacles and such. -- System obstacles and such.
-- Interference -- Interference
-- Asteroids. -- Asteroids.
-- More loading screens.
-- Real news. -- Real news.
-- Dynamic Economy. -- Dynamic Economy.

7
src/save.c
View File

@ -1,7 +1,4 @@
#ifdef _POSIX_SOURCE #include <stdio.h> /* remove() */
#include <unistd.h> /* Unlink. */
#endif
#include "lephisto.h" #include "lephisto.h"
#include "log.h" #include "log.h"
#include "xml.h" #include "xml.h"
@ -191,7 +188,7 @@ static void load_menu_delete(unsigned int wdw, char* str) {
return; return;
snprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%ssaves/%s.ls", lfile_basePath(), save); snprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%ssaves/%s.ls", lfile_basePath(), save);
unlink(path); remove(path); /* Remove is more portable and will call unlink on Linux. */
/* Need to reload the menu. */ /* Need to reload the menu. */
load_menu_close(wdw, NULL); load_menu_close(wdw, NULL);